| 성경장절 |
히브리서 7장 11절 |
| 개역개정 |
레위 계통의 제사 직분으로 말미암아 온전함을 얻을 수 있었으면 (백성이 그 아래에서 율법을 받았으니) 어찌하여 아론의 반차를 따르지 않고 멜기세덱의 반차를 따르는 다른 한 제사장을 세울 필요가 있느냐 |
| KJV |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| NIV |
If perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the law was given to the people), why was there still need for another priest to come--one in the order of Melchizedek, not in the order of Aaron? |
| 공동번역 |
이스라엘 백성은 레위의 사제 제도를 바탕으로 하고 율법을 받았는데 만일 그 사제 제도로 완전해질 수 있었다면 아론의 계통이 아니라 멜기세덱의 계통인 또 다른 사제를 세울 필요가 어디 있었겠습니까 ? |
| 북한성경 |
이스라엘 백성은 레위의 제사장 제도를 바탕으로 하고 률법을 받았는데 만일 그 제사장제도로 완전해질 수 있었다면 아론의 계통이 아니라 멜기세덱의 계통인 또 다른 제사장을 세울 필요가 어디 있겠습니까? |
| Afr1953 |
As daar dan volkomenheid deur die Levitiese priesterskap was -- want met die oog daarop het die volk die wet ontvang -- waarom was dit nog nodig dat 'n ander priester moes opstaan volgens die orde van Melgis?dek en dat hy dit nie volgens die orde van A?ron genoem word nie? |
| BulVeren |
И така, ако можеше да има съвършенство чрез левитското свещенство ? защото под него народът получи закона ? каква нужда е имало още да се издига друг свещеник, според Мелхиседековия чин, и да не се определя такъв според Аароновия чин? |
| Dan |
Hvis der alts? var Fuldkommelse at f? ved det levitiske Præstedømme (thi p? Grundlag af dette har jo Folket f?et Loven), hvilken Trang var der da yderligere til, at en anden Slags Præst skulde opst? efter Melkisedeks Vis og ikke nævnes efter Arons Vis? |
| GerElb1871 |
Wenn nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum w?re (denn in Verbindung mit demselben (O. gegr?ndet auf dasselbe) hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), welches Bed?rfnis war noch vorhanden, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks aufstehe, und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons genannt werde? |
| GerElb1905 |
Wenn nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum w?re (denn in Verbindung mit demselben (O. gegr?ndet auf dasselbe) hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), welches Bed?rfnis war noch vorhanden, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks aufstehe, und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons genannt werde? |
| GerLut1545 |
Ist nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum geschehen (denn unter demselbigen hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), was ist denn weiter not zu sagen, daß ein anderer Priester aufkommen solle nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons? |
| GerSch |
Wenn nun das Vollkommenheit w?re, was durch das levitische Priestertum kam (denn unter diesem hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), wozu w?re es noch n?tig, daß ein anderer Priester ?nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks? auftrete und nicht einer ?nach der Ordnung Aarons? bezeichnet werde? |
| UMGreek |
Εαν λοιπον η τελειοτη? υπηρχε δια Λευιτικη? ιερωσυνη? διοτι ο λαο? επ αυτη? ελαβε τον νομον τι? χρεια πλεον να εγερθη αλλο? ιερευ? κατα την ταξιν Μελχισεδεχ, και ουχι να λεγηται κατα την ταξιν Ααρων; |
| ACV |
If indeed therefore perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people had received the law), what further need is there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? |
| AKJV |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| ASV |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron? |
| BBE |
Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron? |
| DRC |
If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech, and not be called according to the order of Aaron? |
| Darby |
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with *it*, what need was there still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron? |
| ESV |
Jesus Compared to Melchizedek (ver. 18, 19; ch. 8:7; [Gal. 2:21]) Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron? |
| Geneva1599 |
If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron? |
| GodsWord |
The people established the Levitical priesthood based on instructions they received. If the work of the Levitical priests had been perfect, we wouldn't need to speak about another kind of priest. However, we speak about another kind of priest, a priest like Melchizedek, not a Levitical priest like Aaron. |
| HNV |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need wasthere for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| JPS |
|
| Jubilee2000 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| LITV |
Truly, then, if perfection was through the Levitical priestly office (for the people had been given Law under it), why yet need for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek and not to be called according to the order of Aaron? |
| MKJV |
Therefore if perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the Law), what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| RNKJV |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,)what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| RWebster |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood , (for under it the people received the law ,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchizedek , and not be called after the order of Aaron ? |
| Rotherham |
If indeed, therefore, there had been, a perfecting through means of the Levitical priesthood,?for, the people, thereon, have had based a code of laws, what further need, according to the rank of Melchizedek, for a different priest to be raised up, and, not according to the rank of Aaron, to be designated? |
| UKJV |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| WEB |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need wasthere for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| Webster |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron? |
| YLT |
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood--for the people under it had received law--what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron? |
| Esperanto |
Tial, se ekzistis perfekteco per la Levida pastreco (cxar sub gxi la popolo ricevis la legxon), kia plua bezono estis, ke levigxu alia pastro laux la maniero de Melkicedek, kaj ne estu nomata laux la maniero de Aaron? |
| LXX(o) |
|
인기검색어
3132934
